Prime Minister Marape Urges Public to Consider Full Context of Paraka Matter
Prime Minister James Marape has called on Papua New Guineans to consider the full context of legal proceedings and court findings related to the long-running Paraka matter, following renewed public discussion generated by recent media coverage.
In a statement issued on Monday, June 1, 2026, Prime Minister Marape said the matter had already undergone extensive examination through the country's judicial system, with findings reached through established legal processes.
The Prime Minister explained that during his time as Minister for Finance, steps were taken to halt payments linked to the matter, while investigations were initiated to determine the circumstances surrounding the case. He also noted that he personally appeared as a witness during court proceedings associated with the matter.
Responding to references made to himself and former Finance Secretary Steven Gibson in recent reports, Marape emphasized that neither individual had been convicted of any offence in relation to the case.
He stated that clear directives had been issued to ensure that only lawful payments were processed, maintaining that any payments made outside those instructions occurred despite the measures that had been put in place.
While acknowledging the legal rights of Jacob Yafai to pursue any available avenues through the courts, the Prime Minister expressed concern that repeated media coverage without broader context could create an inaccurate perception of the matter among the public.
Marape said his government's commitment to combating corruption and protecting public funds would remain unchanged despite political criticism, public scrutiny, or media attention.
"People may have the power of the pen, but ordinary Papua New Guineans also have the power of reason, judgment and common sense," the Prime Minister said.
He reaffirmed his commitment to accountability, transparency, and good governance, stressing that public discussion on the matter should remain focused on facts, evidence, and the legal findings already established through the courts.
Comments